Wednesday, 17 April 2013

Standing on the wrong side of history

Today, as a nation, we stood on the wrong side of history.  This country stood up and gave an almost-state funeral to a woman who makes me ashamed to be British.


Today, I have paid for a 3 hour party political broadcast for the Tory party and I am not happy about it. 

A Union flag draped coffin is carried on a gun carriage drawn by the King's Troop Royal Artillery

In a month where the Tories have told us that cuts to benefits are “essential” yet they have been able to afford to give a £100,000/year tax cut to the rich we have somehow found the, potentially, £10 million needed to pay for Margaret Thatcher’s funeral.  The irony of the state funding the funeral of a woman who believed that no-one should rely on the state has, apparently, been lost on the Tory party.

She made me complicit in apartheid when she refused to back sanctions against the South African government.  She was also a supporter of Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe saying that “A successful Zimbabwe will undoubtedly contribute to the peace and stability of Central and Southern Africa as a whole, and we wish you and your colleagues well in your endeavours,”  Her support for General Pinochet in Chile was similarly damaging. Juan Gabriel Valdes, a former minister in the Chilean government, has spoken of the close relationship between Margaret Thatcher and Augusto Pinochet. “She was never overly pre-occupied with the issue of human rights” and claimed that "She had a shared vision with General Pinochet, no doubt, and also with other dictators in the world”.  Not in my name.

This is a woman who called the people of a community which had 20% unemployment “moaning minnies” when they blamed her, rightly, for their situation.  She destroyed communities across the country with her economic policies – for instance Barnsley lost 25% of its jobs during Thatcher’s time as PM.  The town still has fewer jobs today than it did in 1979.  She took over in 1979 vowing to bring unemployment under control as it hit 1 million for the first time in history.  By 1983 it had hit 3 million.  It never fell below 2 million during her time in Downing Street.  200,000 out of 250,000 miners lost their jobs between 1979 and 1990. Families were divided, children went hungry and inequality increased. 
The north lost 1.3 million jobs between 1979 and 1990, the south gained 3,500. She wasted the windfall from North Sea Oil by lowering taxation to buy votes at the next election.  Norway got the same windfall and has a Sovereign Wealth Fund and we are dreadfully in debt and have lost our AAA credit rating. She stole from EVERYONE in GB and then had the gall to sell them back their stolen property.  She stole their banks, their railways, their oil, coal, gas, electricity, phones, postal service and then turned up on their doorsteps to sell it back to them.  She couldn’t have been more of a thief if she’d carried a bag labelled “swag”.  And they didn’t even notice!  Beyond the theft element here is another factor – if government still controlled gas etc they could have used it to aid recovery from our current financial crisis – subsidising gas would have given people more money in their pockets to spend and stimulate the economy.  The government lost part of its flexibility to respond to economic crises when she sold the family silver. She stole from me and she made my government weaker by her theft.

Last week, Obama described her as having defended freedom.  She defended freedoms if they were used as she wished.  Any potential opponent had their freedom reduced.  In 1980 she introduced legislation to Parliament that allowed police to stop and search without cause.  She authorised the use of wire-tapping without a warrant ( for instance in 1984 a study referred to a case of evident phone tapping. Without a warrant the police had tapped the phones of miners in south Wales.  They chartered a bus to take them to Derbyshire during the strike, within moments of the booking the police rang the bus company to see how many pickets they would be taking)  a clear violation of civil rights. In Ireland her government colluded in the murder of human rights lawyer Pat Finucane in 1989 and, by advocating what she called a “Cromwellian” solution to the trouble in Ireland suggested Catholics should be moved over the border from NI to Eire in 1985. She turned the mounted police on protesters at Orgreave and destroyed unions ability to defend the rights of their members – we are far more vulnerable at work as a result of her policies.


She failed to protect the weakest in the country including veterans from the Falklands conflict. Her “care in the community” programme saw veterans suffering PTSD being turned out of mental health facilities and into a "care in the community" programme that couldn’t cope.  Falklands veterans have a higher suicide rate than those returning from any other conflict, more have committed suicide upon their return than died in the conflict – they were not adequately supported on their return. The failure of "care in the community" fuelled a homelessness crisis across the UK.  20,000 people in London alone were living in charity accommodation and shelters by 1990 with a further 1000 sleeping rough.  The post-war low for sleeping rough is 6 in London.  Drug addiction rates rose with the BMA stating in 1984 that drug addiction was “not just an epidemic but a plague”.  Thatcher’s role in this became clear with a further study published in the BMJ in 1986 that found that “long term unemployment” was a causal factor in drug addiction.  Her demonisation of homosexuals with the infamous section 28 fuelled a spike in suicides with gay teens four times more likely to commit suicide than their straight contemporaries.  Thatcher did not unite Briton she divided it.

One of the most frustrating thing about today has been that, on the day we bury a woman who supposedly “defended” freedom, I have spent today without my freedom of speech.  Because I have not approved of this Tory led pity fest and the seeming canonisation of “St Maggie” I have been accused of being “crass”, “insensitive” and worse.  I would like to remind people that today was not a private funeral; it was not a private, family memorial service. It was a public occasion that the public have been forced to pay for – people had a right to protest and, if you truly defend freedom, you should be defending “to their death their right to say it” even if you don’t agree with what they are saying. I have a right to comment on how my taxes are spent and if you spend them on a funeral Mr Cameron then, I am afraid, you can expect my comment on that funeral.

As a nation we stood on the wrong side of history today. We stood on the side of the oppressor rather than the oppressed. And I will not stay quiet while we do.

Monday, 10 December 2012

A good day


Just some of the goodies on sale today

Today is International Human Rights Day. It's today because the UN Declaration of Human Rights was adopted on10 December 1948.   My student society wanted to take the opportunity to raise the profile of the issue at school and have arranged different ways of doing this.  Tonight the Debating Society will hold a debate with the motion "This house believes that torture can be justified" and two of my student society members are in opposition.  They also decided to hold a bake sale and rather than simply heading down to Tesco and reselling they decided to make the stuff.  Chaos.  Absolute chaos! But it was amazing.  They spent the whole afternoon yesterday and today baking goodies and sold them at the end of the school day.  The atmosphere while we were baking was great; really good fun with lots of jolly chatter and good will.  They really came together today. The picture shows some of the goodies on offer.  They're also going to sell them at the debate tonight too.  They have already raised £121 for the Red Crescent which they want to support given their connection with Palestine from the trip last year.  They did something today.  And I really couldn't be prouder.  Given that it's the dark end of term, we're all shattered (especially them) and how busy they are with work I am really impressed that they gave up so much time to help people who need it.
 

Monday, 3 December 2012

Yummy things for good causes

Have had a very lovely afternoon today.  We spent the day planning what my human rights youth group will do for International Human Rights day next Monday.  We have decided that, in order to raise awareness, we are going to do a bake sale and raise money as well. How lovely.  The kids are also hoping that it will create some discussion given everything that's been in the media recently about Gaza and also about the Mau Mau cases over here. So I get to spend next Monday afternoon in baking hell but it will all be in aid of a good cause. So, if you happen to be around school next Monday (10/12) at 5pm then please come and support us.  If not, send us happy thoughts as we will probably need them!  Yummy, yummy...

Friday, 30 November 2012

Waking up to good news

I was woken up in the night last night when my email pinged with a new message.  This normally annoys me; last night it was Ken de Bevoise’s “Continuing Education” email with breaking news;  Palestine had been granted non-member observer status at the UN.  This may not seem to be a major step but it is part of the process of membership – one day – and we no longer have to use “Palestine” (with the quote marks) as a title.  It will grant Palestine membership  of UN institutions and it will have the same diplomatic position as the Vatican. It exists.  Somewhat predictably Britain abstained; couldn’t quite bring ourselves to upset America enough to do the right thing.  It had been expected given comments made over the past few days by William Hague but it’s still disappointing to know that, when it came to the crunch, we didn’t have enough spine to do what was right.  I suppose the best we can say is that we didn’t, at least, vote against it as America did.  I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised with America either.  It has been fairly obvious that they weren’t going to elevate the status of Palestine.  One can only hope that this doesn’t lead to a slashing of the contributions that the USA makes to UN based aid agencies as has happened in the past.  One US Senator (Republican – predictably) even went so far as to suggest that the US cut off all funding to the General Assembly if that vote went against them. It did – overwhelmingly.

Does it surprise me that today Israel has announced that it going to build 3000 more settler homes in the West Bank and in East Jerusalem? On top of this 1000 more planning permissions are to be fast-tracked.   This will add to the 500,000 Israelis who already live in the West Bank.  This may sound like a more-or-less harmless case of sour grapes given yesterday’s vote.  However, the more that Israel carves up the West Bank by spreading settler communities the harder it will be to create a coherent contiguous Palestine that will exist as a viable state.  The Israelis seem to be hoping that the spread of settlements will prevent a fully independent Palestinian state from becoming a reality.  This also contravenes UN Resolution 446 which called upon Israel to cease expansion of settlement communities, in fact, there is rather a long list of UN Resolutions that Israel has ignored. If there is going to peace in the region it will come as a “two state solution”, however, allowing Israel to consistently ignore international law is not the way to achieve a way forward.

It may be that one of the new agencies/organisations that Palestine has access to is the ICC…if that is the case then Israel’s ongoing refusal to listen to the UN might be about to be tested in court. 

Tuesday, 20 November 2012

On an article from the Jerusalem Post

From the Jerusalem Post

“Indeed, there are a lot of intense emotions in the county right now: on the one hand there is the ever present thought of our fellow soldiers and civilians under fire, and the fear for their, and our, lives. And on the other hand there is the need to fight, to push back the threat, to repel the war machine that has surfaced against us, right next door.

So many of us Israelis are tired of allowing our people to be terrorised, and that is what motivates us to overcome the fear of the here and now, the fear of the loss of our lives today in the hopes of a better tomorrow. We are a nation that takes proclamations and efforts to kill us seriously. And we are tired of the fear.

We have come a long way to have our country, and we are not about to give it up.

We know it is time to destroy threats that we live with daily. And this is a message to Iran.

To Egypt. To Syria. Even to Saudi Arabia. We will survive and we will not be pushed around.”  By YISHAI FLEISHER


The rhetoric that Israel is using to defend its position here is terrifying and misleading.  By seeking to draw attention towards the shelling that they are suffering at present they are drawing attention away from the years of abuse that have backed the people of Palestine into such a desperate situation.   
For example; Israel claims to have no hold over Gaza since they withdrew in 2005.  However, they have sustained the blockade in such a way as to reduce the people who live there to  a state a dire poverty.  They have also sustained control over essentials such as the water supply. 
However, this attempted diversion is typical of Israel’s propaganda machine.  For example, when the aid flotilla was stopped by the Israeli military in 2010 the Israel press took steps to deflect attention away from the fact that they had boarded the ship illegally.  They stressed the fact that they met with resistance upon boarding in order to justify the killing of nine activists.  The fact remains that their action in boarding the vessel contravened international law.  The ship was in International Waters and as such was under the authority of the nation whose flag it was flying; in this case Turkey.  By stressing that they had met with resistance they were diverting attention from the very fact that they should not have been on board in the first place.


“A strong opening isn’t enough, you also have to know how to finish – and finish decisively. If it isn’t clear whether the ball crossed the goal-line or not, the goal isn’t decisive. The ball needs to hit the net, visible to all. What does a decisive victory sound like? A Tarzan-like cry that lets the entire jungle know in no uncertain terms just who won, and just who was defeated.

To accomplish this, you need to achieve what the other side can’t bear, can’t live with, and our initial bombing campaign isn’t it.

THE DESIRE (sic) to prevent harm to innocent civilians in Gaza will ultimately lead to harming the truly innocent: the residents of southern Israel. The residents of Gaza are not innocent, they elected Hamas. The Gazans aren’t hostages; they chose this freely, and must live with the consequences.”

The level of denial required to publish an article like this terrifies me.  Israel cannot claim to be an innocent victim in this scenario when it is their policies and actions, really since 1948, that have bred the situation they are in.  You cannot abuse a people as Israel has abused the people of Palestine then claim to be the victim of a unprovoked attack.   As I’ve said before, shelling civilians is wrong, but there is more to story than Israel would like us to believe.

Monday, 19 November 2012

Things to give me hope

I met with my human rights group at school today.  For those of you that don't know, 10 December this year marks the UN sponsored International Human Rights day.  As a society my students are planning to do something to mark this.  The Debate Club is holding a debate on that evening on a human rights theme; the issue will be torture.  Students from that group are planning that event.
 
My society is holding a bake sale after last lesson on the Monday to sell baked yummies that they will spend their afternoon making.  They will then donate the money the bake sale makes to a human rights themed charity.  We were planning (roughly) to do something on the theme of asylum seekers but after the news this week they have changed their minds.  They want to raise money for, and awareness of, the people of Palestine in order to counter the bias contained in the information our students are receiving from the British media.  Many of these students were in Israel last year and saw first hand what life in the West Bank communties can be like. I have to say I'm a little bit proud right now! 

Any suggestions of charities that focus on the condition of the people living in Gaza and the West Bank more generally and that don't have any dodgy connections would be gratefully received...

Sunday, 18 November 2012

Gaza

Before I start this I feel the need to qualify a few things.  A lot of this is based on my own experience in Israel last year and on what I saw & experienced in Bethlehem and Jericho.  The photos I've included are ones I took myself.  I would hope that I could never be accused of being anti-Semitic, indeed, most of my former students would agree that this would be far from the case.  Given all of this, I would like to comment on the situation as it seems to be at the moment in Gaza. I realise that I’m probably laying myself open to some serious verbal abuse here.


One thing I realised last October was the serious discrepancy between what is happening over there and the way things are reported in by European/British/American media outlets.   I feel that the same thing is happening again.  It is impossible in any situation to justify the indiscriminate killing of innocent civilians by any side in a conflict.  Given the long standing treatment experienced in Gaza and the rest of Palestine at the hands of the Israeli government it does not surprise me that some resort to violence.  While I was in Bethlehem I saw firsthand the humiliating treatment of Palestinians at check points.  We were told a story by a Coptic Christian living in Bethlehem; he had lost his family olive grove because it was the wrong side when the wall went up.  His young daughter had leukaemia.  They were entirely dependent on hospitals in Israel but frequently found to impossible to access treatment because they could not get through the  checkpoints; they were at the whim of the staff manning the checkpoint that day. (The photo above shows the wall around Bethlehem).  This is daily life for many in Palestine.  I didn’t go to Gaza where the day-to-day situation is so much worse. 



(The picture shows the building of new Israeli settlements in the West Bank)

The ongoing mistreatment of the Palestinian people has led to the growing frustration within their community.  In 2005 Israel sealed off Gaza and in 2006 imposed a full blockade of the strip.  This was supported by the western powers.  In 2008/09 it was Israel that broke a six month cease fire with Hamas and in three weeks around 1400 Palestinians were killed in the shelling, around 300 of those were children.  13 Israelis were killed during this time period.  The UN report into this incident (the Goldstone Report) condemned the Israeli action as a war crime but Britain, America etc did nothing.  Amnesty also reported on this action, known as Operation “Cast Lead”  pointing to the use of F-16 bombers which “targeted and destroyed civilian homes without warning, killing and injuring scores of their inhabitants while they slept”.   A link to their report from December 2009 is below.


In November 2009, President Obama appealed to the Israeli government to stop their settlement expansion in places like East Jerusalem.  This was ignored and America did nothing.  They also control the water supplies to West Bank communities.  Desmond Tutu has compared the daily situation for the Palestinian people to life under apartheid in South Africa.

Hamas as an organisation was really aggressive during the 1980s and Israel still quotes example of their rhetoric from this period to justify actions against them.  No doubt Hamas still has questionable people within its organisation that are prepared to resort to despicable tactics. However, since they became part of the political process in 2006 the language they use has mellowed significantly.  One thing Britain learned in Ireland was that, if you really want peace then you have to include people like Martin McGuiness & co who had clear and well proven connections to the IRA.  Although the situation in Ireland is far from resolved the inclusion of people like McGuiness did help lead to a way forward for both sides; it enabled them to step back from the brink.  Israel needs to learn from this.   In the words of the West Wing "you negotiate with the mail man if you have to". The deliberate targeting of civilians is wrong.  But until both sides step back then this will continue as both sides seek revenge.  Since 1948, when Britain infamously left “the key under the doormat” Israel have been carrying out a policy which has added up to a slow process of ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians. Perhaps membership of the UN will offer them some protection but this will not happen if the US continues to stand in the way as they publicly did in 2011 when they spoke out against the Palestinian request to join.

There are two sides to every story and Israel has been the victim of counter strikes and attacks.  However, they cannot continue to treat people in the way the Palestinians are treated on a daily basis and claim that their hands are clean.  There are two sides to every story and the British media mainly only shows the one. 

Let the accusations begin…